<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Restoring a damaged photograph, digitally</title>
	<atom:link href="http://practicalarchivist.com/restoring-a-damaged-photograph-digitally/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://practicalarchivist.com/restoring-a-damaged-photograph-digitally/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 13:28:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: rharrison</title>
		<link>http://practicalarchivist.com/restoring-a-damaged-photograph-digitally/comment-page-1/#comment-416</link>
		<dc:creator>rharrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 05:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://practicalarchivist.com/restoring-a-damaged-photograph-digitally/#comment-416</guid>
		<description>You should also mention Open Source applications like &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://gimp.org&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;GIMP&lt;/a&gt;.  Not only are they incredibly powerful tools but can be downloaded for free.  Also the fact that they are Open Source means that the danger of them becoming obsolete or unsupported is vastly less than any proprietary application like Photoshop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should also mention Open Source applications like <a HREF="http://gimp.org" REL="nofollow">GIMP</a>.  Not only are they incredibly powerful tools but can be downloaded for free.  Also the fact that they are Open Source means that the danger of them becoming obsolete or unsupported is vastly less than any proprietary application like Photoshop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
