Comments on: Microsoft’s new format could replace JPEG within a year http://practicalarchivist.com/microsofts-new-format-could-replace-jpeg-within-a-year/ Mon, 01 Aug 2011 02:29:37 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: Jane http://practicalarchivist.com/microsofts-new-format-could-replace-jpeg-within-a-year/comment-page-1/#comment-409 Jane Fri, 20 Feb 2009 19:52:00 +0000 http://practicalarchivist.com/microsofts-new-format-could-replace-jpeg-within-a-year/#comment-409 What a great post! (And great blog.) I am hopeful that as technology develops, there will always be folks who will specialize in converting from one format to another (for a fee, of course). What a great post! (And great blog.) I am hopeful that as technology develops, there will always be folks who will specialize in converting from one format to another (for a fee, of course).

]]> By: Sally J. http://practicalarchivist.com/microsofts-new-format-could-replace-jpeg-within-a-year/comment-page-1/#comment-305 Sally J. Thu, 16 Aug 2007 12:05:00 +0000 http://practicalarchivist.com/microsofts-new-format-could-replace-jpeg-within-a-year/#comment-305 PNG was created as a replacement for GIF -- which had patent problems. I don't think digital cameras are going to start capturing photos as PNG.<br/><br/>For a description of PNG with links to additional sources, see the <a HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Png" REL="nofollow"> Wikipedia entry</a>. PNG was created as a replacement for GIF — which had patent problems. I don’t think digital cameras are going to start capturing photos as PNG.

For a description of PNG with links to additional sources, see the Wikipedia entry.

]]> By: Chris http://practicalarchivist.com/microsofts-new-format-could-replace-jpeg-within-a-year/comment-page-1/#comment-304 Chris Wed, 15 Aug 2007 00:29:00 +0000 http://practicalarchivist.com/microsofts-new-format-could-replace-jpeg-within-a-year/#comment-304 Wasn't PNG supposed to be the better JPEG? I realise that Microsoft didn't invent that.. Wasn’t PNG supposed to be the better JPEG? I realise that Microsoft didn’t invent that..

]]> By: Sally J. http://practicalarchivist.com/microsofts-new-format-could-replace-jpeg-within-a-year/comment-page-1/#comment-296 Sally J. Sun, 12 Aug 2007 12:27:00 +0000 http://practicalarchivist.com/microsofts-new-format-could-replace-jpeg-within-a-year/#comment-296 Peter, thanks for stopping by -- and thanks for sharing your expertise on your marvelous blog. Peter, thanks for stopping by — and thanks for sharing your expertise on your marvelous blog.

]]> By: Peter Murray http://practicalarchivist.com/microsofts-new-format-could-replace-jpeg-within-a-year/comment-page-1/#comment-292 Peter Murray Sat, 04 Aug 2007 23:30:00 +0000 http://practicalarchivist.com/microsofts-new-format-could-replace-jpeg-within-a-year/#comment-292 I found your link to my older blog post. You may be interested in a posting I just made with thoughts about HD Photo: <a HREF="http://dltj.org/2007/08/hd-photo-versus-jpeg2000/" REL="nofollow">JPEG XR Could Be Neat, but JPEG2000 is Still Neater</a>. I found your link to my older blog post. You may be interested in a posting I just made with thoughts about HD Photo: JPEG XR Could Be Neat, but JPEG2000 is Still Neater.

]]>