<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does Microsoft&#8217;s new format spell the end of JPEG?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://practicalarchivist.com/does-microsofts-new-format-spell-the-end-of-jpeg/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://practicalarchivist.com/does-microsofts-new-format-spell-the-end-of-jpeg/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 13:28:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sally J.</title>
		<link>http://practicalarchivist.com/does-microsofts-new-format-spell-the-end-of-jpeg/comment-page-1/#comment-306</link>
		<dc:creator>Sally J.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 12:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://practicalarchivist.com/does-microsofts-new-format-spell-the-end-of-jpeg/#comment-306</guid>
		<description>Wirehead, there is lot of support for JPEG2000 in Hollywood. The film industry is already using it to compress films that are shot and/or projected digitally. As long as that use is supported, we will be able to read JPEG2000 files.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Unfortunately, no format can claim immortality. If camera manufacturers adopt a new standard, the old one will disappear eventually. &#039;Tis the way of the biz.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Obsolescence and replacement doesn&#039;t mean we lose everything -- just the images that no one bothers to update. Or the ones that no one printed out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wirehead, there is lot of support for JPEG2000 in Hollywood. The film industry is already using it to compress films that are shot and/or projected digitally. As long as that use is supported, we will be able to read JPEG2000 files.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, no format can claim immortality. If camera manufacturers adopt a new standard, the old one will disappear eventually. &#8216;Tis the way of the biz.</p>
<p>Obsolescence and replacement doesn&#8217;t mean we lose everything &#8212; just the images that no one bothers to update. Or the ones that no one printed out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wirehead arts</title>
		<link>http://practicalarchivist.com/does-microsofts-new-format-spell-the-end-of-jpeg/comment-page-1/#comment-303</link>
		<dc:creator>wirehead arts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 05:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://practicalarchivist.com/does-microsofts-new-format-spell-the-end-of-jpeg/#comment-303</guid>
		<description>I dono.  Given the lack of JPEG2000 support in most popular pieces of software, I can&#039;t see the new Microsoft format being especially standard either for your &quot;average person&quot;.  Too many installed pieces of software don&#039;t support it and not many developers are going to bother &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I also tend to think that JPEG has, like GIF and BMP and PCX, achieved a sort of immortality.  It&#039;s kind of like EBCDIC vs. ASCII.  I suspect that you are more likely to have problems with JPEG2000 in the long-term future than JPEG.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dono.  Given the lack of JPEG2000 support in most popular pieces of software, I can&#8217;t see the new Microsoft format being especially standard either for your &#8220;average person&#8221;.  Too many installed pieces of software don&#8217;t support it and not many developers are going to bother </p>
<p>I also tend to think that JPEG has, like GIF and BMP and PCX, achieved a sort of immortality.  It&#8217;s kind of like EBCDIC vs. ASCII.  I suspect that you are more likely to have problems with JPEG2000 in the long-term future than JPEG.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sally J.</title>
		<link>http://practicalarchivist.com/does-microsofts-new-format-spell-the-end-of-jpeg/comment-page-1/#comment-301</link>
		<dc:creator>Sally J.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 02:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://practicalarchivist.com/does-microsofts-new-format-spell-the-end-of-jpeg/#comment-301</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;jralls,&lt;/b&gt; I cried a little when I learned that converting RAW to TIFF involves some loss of information. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;No doubt batch conversion is the way to go. Fortunately I have a copy of  Photoshop, and it makes this process easy. Nice to know that there are converters available for folks who don&#039;t have that software.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>jralls,</b> I cried a little when I learned that converting RAW to TIFF involves some loss of information. </p>
<p>No doubt batch conversion is the way to go. Fortunately I have a copy of  Photoshop, and it makes this process easy. Nice to know that there are converters available for folks who don&#8217;t have that software.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jralls</title>
		<link>http://practicalarchivist.com/does-microsofts-new-format-spell-the-end-of-jpeg/comment-page-1/#comment-298</link>
		<dc:creator>jralls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 19:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://practicalarchivist.com/does-microsofts-new-format-spell-the-end-of-jpeg/#comment-298</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not terribly concerned about jpeg going away in the near term, but long term one never knows. That&#039;s unfortunately just as true about tiff files.  &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.wireheadarts.com/blog44.html&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;This fellow&lt;/a&gt; has some interesting commentary on digital photo archiving file formats.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;When it comes time to convert your photos to a new format, there are programs which will do the job as a batch (meaning that you need invoke the program only once, or at most once per directory). Mac users have the awesome &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.lemkesoft.com&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot;/&gt; which will convert formats and do much more (it&#039;s even AppleScript-able). Microsoft users can get a &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.etrusoft.com/graphic-converter/index.htm&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;basic converter&lt;/a&gt; for free or upgrade to the same company&#039;s more capable pay software. For the ultimate in geekiness, there&#039;s &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.imagemagick.org/script/index.php&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ImageMagick&lt;/a&gt; available for Unix/Linux, Mac OS-X, and Microsoft. Not for the faint of heart, but freely available and open-source.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not terribly concerned about jpeg going away in the near term, but long term one never knows. That&#8217;s unfortunately just as true about tiff files.  <a HREF="http://www.wireheadarts.com/blog44.html" REL="nofollow">This fellow</a> has some interesting commentary on digital photo archiving file formats.</p>
<p>When it comes time to convert your photos to a new format, there are programs which will do the job as a batch (meaning that you need invoke the program only once, or at most once per directory). Mac users have the awesome <a HREF="http://www.lemkesoft.com" REL="nofollow"/> which will convert formats and do much more (it&#8217;s even AppleScript-able). Microsoft users can get a <a HREF="http://www.etrusoft.com/graphic-converter/index.htm" REL="nofollow">basic converter</a> for free or upgrade to the same company&#8217;s more capable pay software. For the ultimate in geekiness, there&#8217;s <a HREF="http://www.imagemagick.org/script/index.php" REL="nofollow">ImageMagick</a> available for Unix/Linux, Mac OS-X, and Microsoft. Not for the faint of heart, but freely available and open-source.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eckenheimer</title>
		<link>http://practicalarchivist.com/does-microsofts-new-format-spell-the-end-of-jpeg/comment-page-1/#comment-277</link>
		<dc:creator>eckenheimer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 07:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://practicalarchivist.com/does-microsofts-new-format-spell-the-end-of-jpeg/#comment-277</guid>
		<description>Legacy Lady, here are a few comments on your post:&lt;br/&gt;1. Highest quality jpeg is a lot smaller in size and very nearly as good as tiff, except for large format, high resolution color photographs. It&#039;s easy to do a side by side comparison to decide whether it&#039;s satisfactory for you.&lt;br/&gt;2. The raw &quot;negatives&quot; are a great idea, but be aware that older raw formats can disappear and programs to process them years from now may be difficult to find. I&#039;m being a bit paranoid here, but it&#039;s happened before.&lt;br/&gt;3. Please be certain to store one copy of the DVD/CD in a remote location in case of fire, tornado, theft, etc. at your home&lt;br/&gt;4. There&#039;s no &quot;do it and forget it&quot; kind of easy answer with digital. Periodic updating or upgrading is a fact of our digital life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Legacy Lady, here are a few comments on your post:<br />1. Highest quality jpeg is a lot smaller in size and very nearly as good as tiff, except for large format, high resolution color photographs. It&#8217;s easy to do a side by side comparison to decide whether it&#8217;s satisfactory for you.<br />2. The raw &#8220;negatives&#8221; are a great idea, but be aware that older raw formats can disappear and programs to process them years from now may be difficult to find. I&#8217;m being a bit paranoid here, but it&#8217;s happened before.<br />3. Please be certain to store one copy of the DVD/CD in a remote location in case of fire, tornado, theft, etc. at your home<br />4. There&#8217;s no &#8220;do it and forget it&#8221; kind of easy answer with digital. Periodic updating or upgrading is a fact of our digital life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Legacy Lady</title>
		<link>http://practicalarchivist.com/does-microsofts-new-format-spell-the-end-of-jpeg/comment-page-1/#comment-273</link>
		<dc:creator>The Legacy Lady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 14:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://practicalarchivist.com/does-microsofts-new-format-spell-the-end-of-jpeg/#comment-273</guid>
		<description>I have often wondered what would be the best way to preserve my digital files.  I shoot in RAW format and save a backup of those files as digital negatives.  From there I process in photoshop and save JPEG - your post has me thinking I should possible look at tiff format - which is supposedly the best way to save without the compression of a JPEG.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I am wondering if my backup plan of 2 dvd&#039;s each and external hard drive is enough.  Wish they would come out with the DVD/CD that lasts 200 years - and the file format with it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have often wondered what would be the best way to preserve my digital files.  I shoot in RAW format and save a backup of those files as digital negatives.  From there I process in photoshop and save JPEG &#8211; your post has me thinking I should possible look at tiff format &#8211; which is supposedly the best way to save without the compression of a JPEG.  </p>
<p>I am wondering if my backup plan of 2 dvd&#8217;s each and external hard drive is enough.  Wish they would come out with the DVD/CD that lasts 200 years &#8211; and the file format with it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sally J.</title>
		<link>http://practicalarchivist.com/does-microsofts-new-format-spell-the-end-of-jpeg/comment-page-1/#comment-235</link>
		<dc:creator>Sally J.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 02:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://practicalarchivist.com/does-microsofts-new-format-spell-the-end-of-jpeg/#comment-235</guid>
		<description>You make a great point about conversions, Apple. Automatic migration would be a GREAT added service for the photo sharing sites. Wonder if it&#039;s occurred to any of them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You make a great point about conversions, Apple. Automatic migration would be a GREAT added service for the photo sharing sites. Wonder if it&#8217;s occurred to any of them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apple</title>
		<link>http://practicalarchivist.com/does-microsofts-new-format-spell-the-end-of-jpeg/comment-page-1/#comment-234</link>
		<dc:creator>Apple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 21:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://practicalarchivist.com/does-microsofts-new-format-spell-the-end-of-jpeg/#comment-234</guid>
		<description>I have uploaded tons of my photos to various hosting sites such as flickr, snapfish, and imageshack as a secondary backup system. Hopefully they&#039;ll be able to convert them for me if/when the time comes. With MS picture-it! I can convert jpg to gif or png but only one pic at a time and I don&#039;t think I&#039;ll live long enough to convert them all that way!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have uploaded tons of my photos to various hosting sites such as flickr, snapfish, and imageshack as a secondary backup system. Hopefully they&#8217;ll be able to convert them for me if/when the time comes. With MS picture-it! I can convert jpg to gif or png but only one pic at a time and I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ll live long enough to convert them all that way!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
